In recent weeks, there have been concerning remarks coming out of Enzo Maresca’s press conferences. Remarks that take Chris Lymn back 18 months to a time when a manager’s relationship with the board went south.


I was delighted to see that Mercury man Jordan Blackwell had also noticed that the executive seem to have learned nothing.

At the start of last season Brendan Rodgers shared his plans with us. He was looking for a serious shake-up of his squad which he felt was ‘stale’.

Not going to happen, replied they who rule. A classic case of right hand and left hand. There followed a shambles of a season in which Rodgers was clearly disenchanted.

Yes, he should have accepted the situation and dealt with it. But then there was the opening game against Brentford, played in tropical conditions. Many fans looked at the possible dropped points as we flagged late on and spotted some sort of signal from manager to board. Those possible points saw us where are now.

Eighteen months later, Enzo too shared his requirements – modest additions to a basically sound squad.

And here’s the board again – not so fast, Enzo. Funds are tight, we need to dump some players first.

Brendan will have chuckled at that.

Blackwell pleads: ‘Don’t let this happen again!’ Jordan, it has.

The first time, some of us remember, the promise was of some sort of ‘inquiry’ to learn lessons from. Anyone read it? Was it actually written? Perhaps it was just two words: Shit happens. Kicking difficult stuff into the long grass is a well-worn British tradition. Check Post Office, Grenfell, Hillsborough et al.

The most frustrating aspect is that nothing has happened to suggest that the relationship between executive and manager is sorted. In the current days of finance being more tightly controlled, you would have thought having the team manager and everyone else in step would be vital.

Fortunately, recruiting in the winter window is probably not crucial (we hope) and Enzo will skilfully manage his existing talent, but that is not the issue. Communication is. And the feeling is that this remarkable manager may feel he is not part of those who man the bridge.

Enzo has recently exhorted more support from his fans. Let’s hope he does not need to do the same with those he relies on not just for support but a closer working relationship. The best managers succeed with their owners, not despite them.

You don’t need an inquiry to recognise the dangers inherent here…

document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo’).onclick=function(){ window.open(‘https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/Premier+League/Leicester+City’,’newsnow’); }; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo’).style.cursor=’pointer’; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo_a’).style.textDecoration=’none’; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo_a’).style.borderBottom=’0 none’;

8 responses to “Deja vu and the inquiry that never was: Leicester City’s top brass need to keep Enzo onside”

  1. Good article. The link between the football side and the board is Rudkin. It seems that he is untouchable even when the serious questions of last season needed to be asked and again potentially this season.

    Like

  2. I would be very surprised if Enzo did not know that the summer transfer window left us close to our spending limit. The skilful way he’s deployed the squad has allowed us to forget the financial mess that still lies beneath the bonnet.

    By my reckoning we are still paying for (at least to some extent) Soumare, Kristiansen, Iversen who are on loan and whose futures are still to be determined. It’s possible we could sell the first two, but at a huge loss, and Iversen would sell to a Championship club but for very little money. Chambers has returned and his salary is now our full responsibility.

    We have Souttar, Praet and Ward in the 25 man squad, who by and large barely kick a ball in anger. I’m convinced Praet has a football allergy. We have four strikers – even though we only play one at a time and Ihenacho’s contract ends in a few months time.Our best number 8 is also out of contract this summer.

    Put simply, we do not have the finances to carry this many players – players for whom we pay top dollar, but are either unwanted, unusable, or about to leave on free transfers. Or a combination of all three.

    Storming the Championship hasn’t changed any of the underlying financial issues, as really ought to be obvious to anyone who follows the club with anything more than passing interest.

    Put simply, we do not

    Like

  3. Unfortunately, the club still paying price for struggles in 2021/2022 not qualifying to Europe.Extended squad and poor planning is crucial here as well as FFP.I’m bit concerned with the deep of lcfc bench (all struggles visible over Coventry game with no really good players available)I’m also concern that we lost all games to teams located in top half and current fixture ( Leeds, hull, Sunderland away) makes me bit nervous.

    Like

  4. Enzo has clearly stated that he has targets and a requirement to strengthen the squad in some areas and according to the press has identified at least one good looking target. He has also stated that he understands we must sell or at least release bench players from the squad to bring more players in. He may not like this situation that is not of his making as the players came in under previous managers but he understands it. The club has to live within it’s FFP limits and as Forest & Everton (and hopefully Man. City) are learning the consequences of not doing so can be troubling. As fans of the club let’s not stir up concerns where not needed.

    Like

  5. I agree that unnecessary concerns should not be raised.But EM says (Leicester Mercury) that he was not informed of the guidelines the club needed to follow until the week after the window opened.

    Like

  6. I’m not sure there’s any evidence Enzo isn’t aware of the club’s financial constraints. He was given decent funds to spend in the summer. I think his occasionally obtuse press conference comments can be put down to English not being his first language. I don’t think there’s a new or emerging story here. We are still carrying the burden of two seasons of diabolical recruitment, in financial and playing terms. The current round of International tournaments is causing a problem as several expendables can’t be moved on. It’s noteworthy that Man City have no players at these winter tournaments…..Glover take note!

    Like

  7. The Loss Limits aren’t guidelines, they’re strict rules that need adhering to with loopholes shut off increasingly since 2021. Can list some examples if you like.

    Like

  8. Also to add.

    The new rule may have played a role here..

    Clubs who lose a certain amount have to submit their accounts to the PL by 31st December 2023.

    Crucially, this applies to relegated clubs except to the EFL not PL.

    I wonder if the EFL took one look and believed Leicester may breach FFP this year with further business. Hence restrictions on business without departures.

    As for releasing points, not so simple- Net Book Value really must be considered.

    Like

Leave a comment

viewpoint