The great Leicester City exodus is on. For so long a mirage that hovered just out of reach, the Squad Refresh is happening.

With eight players having already departed Leicester City this summer, and at least a couple more to come, we are looking at a complete overhaul of the starting XI.

If we assume Bilal El Khannouss and Victor Kristiansen are next to go, then six of the seven players with the most starts in the Premier League last season have left the club. Were Wout Faes to also depart, that would make it a clean sweep of the top seven.

Even with Faes staying, the players who have left accounted for just over half (51%) of the total minutes played in the last league campaign. This is a big change.

The sales so far have brought in around £50 million, which will probably stretch to something in the region of £80 million once all outgoing business is done. We’re guessing a bit with wages, and we can assume relegation clauses would have reduced this burden to some extent, but if we take last year’s figures from Capology as a guide, Leicester have cut over £24 million from the annual wage bill so far.

Along with the happy coincidence that most of the players sold were rubbish, this seems to have eased the financial pressure on the club. Clearing the path for a late trolley dash for new signings.

To this point Leicester have done virtually nothing. The transfer window slams shut on Monday evening, in five days’ time. We need to do something, but time and resources are limited, and we need to prioritise.

That might mean only one or two new faces, even in a best case scenario. The clear priority is at least one starter-level quality midfielder, and probably a striker as well.

Leicester are, like it or not, a possession team. Through three games, an average of 63% possession works out as the most in the division. This is not surprising. We are one of the stronger teams in the Championship and we like to hand the opponent a head start, that equates to a lot of the ball.

You need competent midfielders to do something with it. You also need to recover the ball and protect the defence when you lose it. Marti Cifuentes likes to press, so the players need to be fit enough to keep that up for a whole season.

When you look at the current squad depth as a whole, the need for players of that ilk in those central areas is stark:

From a depth perspective, things are fine. Hamza Choudhury and Ricardo Pereira are midfield options, Jordan Ayew has played at #10, De Cordova Reid could theoretically do that as well. Louis Page and Will Alves can contribute and hopefully grow as the season goes on.

Over a 46-game season, however, there’s not enough genuine quality in there for a team that’s trying to get promoted. None of those players are Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, nor are they Wilfred Ndidi. Only one of them is Harry Winks.

The first three games have exposed the dramatic drop in midfield class compared to two years ago. In particular, the weakness of a Boubakary Soumare – Oliver Skipp “double pivot”.

A transfer window that remains open throughout the first month of the season may be one of the most disastrous rules in the sport, but at least it means you have your inadequacies exposed in live action before it’s too late.

The lack of vision and intent on the ball from those two players is by far the biggest issue that needs to be addressed. Soumare is a defensive midfielder who can’t defend, Skipp is an all-action player who doesn’t get involved in the game. A rehabilitated Winks would be a big part of the solution, but realistically a new face is needed to compliment him.

Soumare has only a year left on his deal, whereas Skipp has four(!). A replacement for the former is the best use of money right now, then you hope a better partner helps Skipp to improve. He has much more potential value to Leicester than Soumare does.

Focusing on that area with the bulk of whatever resources we have means less pressure to solve the attacking midfield issue. Quality attacking midfielders do not come cheap and most people don’t want to let theirs go, especially this late in the window.

Leicester were able to use the Premier League to extract El Khannouss from Belgium a year ago, we can’t dangle that carrot this time around.

A more solid base would reduce the amount of goals we need to score, and would probably free up the attack to be more effective anyway. If your midfield can’t get control of the game, the attackers can’t get into it. This touch map from the Charlton game shows the chasm in central areas:

A permanent central midfielder, ideally combined with an attempt to convince a young attacking player on loan from the Premier League is the ideal solution. That would allow Cifuentes to shape the midfield in the way he wants, rather than his current patchwork job, using bits of leftover, rusting metal to try to build an aeroplane.

The other obvious issue is up front. That suffers from many of the same issues as finding a new #10, the main difference being that a new face would take minutes away from Jordan Ayew and Patson Daka, rather than two academy products.

Again, a loan seems more likely, and probably a better use of resources than splashing out on an expensive new striker who would certainly not have been the first choice.

Another forward would have the benefit of freeing up Ayew to play deeper, where he’s probably better anyway. Plus, of course, the striker might score goals, which neither of the current incumbents are very adept at doing.

There are clearly other areas that, in an ideal world, would be strengthened. A starting left back would be nice, so would another winger. Leicester probably should have signed two strikers this summer, never mind zero by the end of August. The entire midfield could be replaced and no one would lose any sleep over it.

This is not an ideal world. Leicester need fresh faces in key areas more than we need to gorge on as many signings as possible. Rather than trying to fix everything, it makes sense to make a couple of moves in the areas that will have the most impact.

You can’t be a good team without a good midfield. Quality in those areas tend to make other players look better, by protecting the defence and making sure the exciting attacking players get the ball.

Over to you, Jon.

8 responses to “What MUST Leicester City do before the transfer deadline?”

  1. I agree.

    The obvious solution would be Brownhill on a free. It’s so obvious that maybe he’s asking for too high a wage, which as history proves, we should bulk at.

    At the top end, there must be a striker in a PL academy that needs minutes in a ‘strong’ (hopefully) Championship team?

    With Evans seemingly out of the picture for now (and possibly a wide player anyway), there doesn’t appear to be anyone in our academy as a striker. In fact, it’s 30 years since we produced a PL level striker (Heskey, 1995 debut). There’s not been many lower level ones either.

    Like

    1. I almost mentioned Brownhill specifically, seems strange that he’s not signed yet.

      There’s going to be so many players at the top clubs needing to be sold or loaned at the last minute – there’s opportunities there for sure.

      Like

  2. sensationallycheesecake1a72bb4c91 Avatar
    sensationallycheesecake1a72bb4c91

    Manager on Soumare – Jordon Blackwell – https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/marti-cifuentes-much-faith-leicester-10454526

    Plus, he’s now a man that Marti Cifuentes clearly relies on at the base of his midfield.

    The manager said: “He’s got the qualities and the strengths to play in the number six or in the number eight position.

    “Technically he’s a very good player and he’s physically very strong. He understands the game as well.

    “So far we are using him more as a number six, a holding midfielder, important in our build-up, important in our quality to get high to the pitch, to break the lines, to progress with the team as well to be the player that everybody knows is going to be there all the time to switch the game, to play the through.

    “Defensively, he’s a player who can help us especially to recover the ball quickly. He has this capacity to cover big spaces but at the same time he is very good at intercepting and anticipating.

    “He’s a very good player so we’re trying to get the best of him whatever the position.”

    Like

    1. That…that concerns me

      Like

      1. sensationallycheesecake1a72bb4c91 Avatar
        sensationallycheesecake1a72bb4c91

        I think it concerns many fans.

        Like

  3. perfectlygeneral7f47ddc523 Avatar
    perfectlygeneral7f47ddc523

    As Palace pull out of the BEK move this is not the first time other clubs have left us too near the end of window to do business. Time for deadlines?

    Chris Lymn

    Like

  4. noisilystrangerfef58960dd Avatar
    noisilystrangerfef58960dd

    Good article highlighting the deficiencies in central midfield which apart from striker are the key problem area for the team.The lack of ball winners and physicality are highlighted by our general struggle with setpieces,Skipp,Soumare and Winks provide little shield to the back four,hence Charltons 20 shots 7 on target.Soumare managed three tackles to none in the previous two matches and he had a much better game,Skipp again disappointing and seems to run around to little effect.Its a struggle to see how he got in the championship team of the year with Norwich,has the standard moved up that much? I thought the ref was good at Charlton but whats becoming increasingly obvious is that teams are recognising our lack of physicality and targeting us.I was very disappointed we lost McAteer because he is a player who can stand upto that in addition to Ndidi,Justin,Kristiansen and Faes they are actually more physically able than a lot of our squad.Its one of the problems we have creating chances we have so little physical presence in the opposition box.I keep repeating it but the great Martin O´Neill said “You have to win the physical battle to play your football” It was true then and its even truer today where refs left so many “robust” challenges go

    Like

  5. i really don’t understand your continual championing of harry winks. He’s not very good. A 20 minute man at best, who tires and gives at least 1 golden chance to the opposition every match. And how you can put Reid in with a serious face is mind boggling.

    Like

Leave a comment

viewpoint