The howls of fury that formed the soundtrack of the opening stages of this lunchtime kick off and the vast swathes of empty seats that served as its backdrop told their own story. Marti Cifuentes is in deep trouble and this season is in danger of coming off the rails.

This was the fifth time Leicester City have been 3-0 down at half time in 2025. If one first half calamity is unfortunate and two looks like incompetence, perhaps five should be the cue for a mass citizens arrest that sees the entire club rounded up and thrown in the slammer.

Three of those games have come at the King Power, so it’s hardly surprising that, by the time 11 chastened blue shirts disappeared into the bowels of the stadium at half time, the sheer volume of empty seats diluted the angry reaction that followed them down the tunnel.

The second half revival of sorts means this result doesn’t look as bad as the Southampton game. The first 45 minutes, though, were undoubtedly far worse than Tuesday night. It’s hard to know whether a manager has ‘lost the dressing room’, but it’s clear that the dressing room isn’t listening to this manager.

For all the talk about delivering a reaction, the team showed no sign of any new resilience, or even any vague sense of application or professionalism. Instead, they conceded a horrendous goal inside 60 seconds.

Players are going to make mistakes every now and again. Bade Aluko’s mistake the other night was acceptable to some extent given his age and inexperience. Even a mistake like Asmir Begovic randomly passing the ball to Gustavo Hamer, as he did in the final minute of normal time here and which the Blades attacker put over an open goal, is understandable. These things happen, it’s not realistic to expect every player to play flawlessly.

What is far less acceptable is the sort of collective mistakes that we keep seeing. For all that those on the pitch have to take personal responsibility, it’s hard not to think that there are plenty of managers out there who would do better than be buried in the bottom half with this group. Either this club is uniquely unmanageable, or someone could do a better job.

We should at least expect the basics. Some leadership and a culture of accountability would be a start. A semblance of tactical nous and defensive organisation, neither of which were in any evidence here, wouldn’t go amiss either. Perhaps one or two players would improve under new management, rather than continually get worse as they are doing now.

If there’s no leadership, no tactics – what are Leicester City actually trying to do in any given game, does anyone know? – and none of the players are improving, then it’s hard to pinpoint any reason to keep the manager.

The first goal of this game should be framed and put in a vault, preserved for future generations to savour the Class of ’25. There are so many nominees for the worst goal this team has conceded all year that we’d be here all week listing them, but Tom Cannon putting Sheffield United in the lead after a minute has to be in the top three.

With the Blades in possession in an unthreatening position in Leicester’s left back spot, almost every blue shirt in close proximity proceeded to vomit all over themselves until Cannon – of course – slotted in at the back post.

First it was Luke Thomas giving the ball away, then Stephy Mavididi, then Thomas weakly failing to win the ball back, then Wout Faes hacking the cross into the centre of his own box, before Harry Winks delivered the coup de grace: A heavy touch, followed by a huge swipe at thin air, followed by a full Bambi-on-ice routine before falling flat on his face to allow Cannon a free shot at goal. It truly gets worse every time you watch it.

From there the direction of travel was only going one way until the half time interval. Barring a couple of brief forays forward from Mavididi and the odd threatening cross, Leicester produced absolutely nothing of note. They managed no shots on target before the break yet again while Sheffield United ruthlessly exposed a gaping chasm between the defence and midfield.

At times there were six white shirts running at Leicester’s back line, in situations which should never see you exposed to that sort of overload. These weren’t counter attacks, just straight passes into Callum O’Hare or Sydie Peck in the middle of the park. As soon as they turned, they had the freedom of the pitch to drive towards Leicester’s box.

A little like Southampton, Sheffield United let Leicester off the hook with the way they wasted some of these situations. At times in the first half they went too direct, so they went over their midfielders instead of into them, which was what caused the majority of the danger. At other times they got the final ball wrong, choosing to shoot instead of playing in runners on the overlap, and had a lot corners thanks to blocked crosses that felt like opportunities to do better.

Two of those corners still resulted in goals, as free players on the edge of the area pounced on the second ball to fire home. Both had a slight element of luck – a little deflection of Jairo Riedewald saw him become the latest entrant into the ‘he’s scored his first goal for the club!’ hall of fame, then there was possibly a push on Patson Daka just before Peck hammered home Sheffield United’s third.

It’s hard to quibble too much with this, 3-0 was a completely fair reflection of the game, and it could have been worse. With Faes off the pitch in first half stoppage time, Jordan James was filling in at centre back(!) only to get caught in a 1v1 with Tyrese Campbell, who put him in a blender before firing a golden opportunity wide.

To give Cifuentes and the team some credit, they did battle gamely in the second half. The substitutions he made – introducing Boubakary Soumare, Oliver Skipp, and Jordan Ayew – looked apocalyptic at the time but made a big difference. Soumare in particular seemed to solve the key problem, which was the total lack of blue shirts in midfield, while also playing a number of threatening forward passes to Mavididi and Abdul Fatawu.

Skipp has had an implausibly good week, as he put in probably the best left back performance of any Leicester player this season on Tuesday, and followed it up with a solid 45 minutes in a lesser spotted big man-little man centre back partnership with Jannik Vestergaard here. Though it must be said that when it came to the last five minutes and you were watching a team play Skipp at centre half and Vestergaard up front, it was hard not to think that something may have gone a little wrong somewhere along the line.

By that time the feel of the game had totally changed, as Leicester, backed into a corner, responded with an intensity that has been lacking all year. They moved the ball quicker, kept feeding the wingers in dangerous areas, and pinned Sheffield United on the edge of their own area.

Sometimes when a game is over by half time the winning team is playing at arm’s length, controlling the game even if the score makes it seem like a comeback is possible. That wasn’t the case in this one, as the Blades were rattled and couldn’t get the ball. Suddenly Leicester players were routinely winning it back and recycling the ball, while all their opponents were doing were hoofing it back.

Ultimately, all this pressure failed to produce enough quality chances to salvage a result. For all the defensive failings, this is the killer. You can’t be bad at defending and bad at scoring goals. The defence might be a lost cause, but there are quality players in advanced areas who just aren’t creating enough.

There were flashes: Fatawu and Mavididi combined extremely well to create the first goal – a Mavididi header at the back post – and to create a good chance for Fatawu on the opposite side, which he tamely shot straight at the goalkeeper when he could have laid it off to James. Another deep Fatawu cross eventually found its way to Thomas, who scuffed his shot from a dangerous position.

The second goal came a little out of nowhere, after Patrick Bamford – in the midst of a truly appalling substitute appearance – lost the ball to Skipp and Soumare. The latter fed James, who hit a swerving shot from distance that flew into the centre of the goal. Even the ball seemed a little confused at why the ‘keeper made no effort to save it.

With 10 minutes to go it felt like there was one more chance in this game to grab a point, but that chance never came. Jeremy Monga’s very belated introduction – his first appearance of any sort in November – failed to have much impact. Julian Carranza is apparently so bad he can’t even get on the pitch ahead of putting Vestergaard up front, and Ayew is not a penalty box striker, so the wingers have to do everything themselves. Thanks to a fair bit of cunning gamesmanship, the Blades saw things out surprisingly calmly.

The second half display meant the team at least managed to take the air out of the balloon a little when it came to criticism at the end of the game. Even so, it was jarring to watch the likes of Skipp and Ayew laughing and chatting to opposition players at full time. The sort of thing that feels it shouldn’t happen after the week the club has had.

Cifuentes, at least, seemed angry afterwards and spoke like a man who knows how precarious his position is. The service he and the club are selling is now about long term fixes. But he also talked about being accountable for mistakes, which only emphasises his weakness in failing to hold his team to that standard.

The age-old problem for the manager is that while the players might be more at fault than you, you can’t sack the players. He’s been unlucky with injuries to players like Aaron Ramsey and Ben Nelson, who may well have both played this game were they fit, and would give the team a fresher look than Faes and Bobby De Cordova Reid. He’s also been a little unlucky in the timing of the games this week, playing two of the strongest squads in the division – despite being in the relegation zone, the Blades have a far better bench than Leicester – under new management and just as they look to be turning it around.

At the same time, he’s shown very little sign of being worth sticking with. Leicester have rarely looked remotely close to being any good, and only when the crisis has reached existential levels – away at Norwich and at half time in this game – has the handbrake come off and they’ve shown signs of what talent might be there.

This time of year is the period at which reality tends to converge with the underlying data that offers up your expected performance. The real league table starts to reflect expected goals and points between roughly the 15th-20th games of the season. Well, Leicester’s expected goal difference had them 16th ahead of kick off. Following this defeat, they are 16th in the real table as well. There are not many reasons for optimism there.

Data like that only backs up the evidence of our own eyes. Leicester have spent a lot of this season looking like a poor team that has been bailed out by moments of individual quality or fortune. There are hardly any games that you look back on and think they should have won, and far more where they got out of jail. Like the away win at Swansea that required two screamers, or West Brom’s Nat Phillips deflecting in an injury time own goal to save a point. The Foxes ‘lost’ the xG in both of those games – comfortably, in the case of the game at the Hawthorns.

Eventually that starts to even itself out. In a sense, this week has been an example of exactly that. Southampton and Sheffield United have been two of the biggest ‘underperformers’ of the season so far. The meeting of those teams under new management, riding the crest of a mini wave, versus a Leicester side that looks like a house built on sand, has delivered a cold slap of reality.

The fact the Championship is so tightly congested is a good thing because it offers hope that you can quickly turn things around. Virtually everyone can still dream of a run top the top six and potential promotion, and it’s true that a lot of teams who end up in the playoffs come from a long way back. It’s about timing your form.

To some extent though such congestion can also be a mirage, one that tricks you into thinking you are only a couple of wins away from those playoffs so you don’t need to make a change.

Leicester’s next three games are against teams above them and the next home game is against Ipswich who, despite Friday’s defeat, might be the second best team in the league. This is a very dangerous period. The season could go down the drain in the next fortnight.

Maybe Cifuentes hobbles on, either because of the leadership vacuum at the top or because a team seven points from the relegation zone with a points deduction hanging over its head is not an attractive prospect. But something has to change.

10 responses to “Leicester City 2 Sheffield United 3: What’s worse than going three down once this week?”

  1. I think the worst thing the club could do right now is sack Cifuentes – apart from the timing and the potential reshuffle above him, and that, let’s face it, the squad is, as you suggest, unmanageable, the list of possible replacements only likely to be the usual has-beens and more recent failures, apart from this, I personally believe he’s shown signs of being a genuinely decent manager – amidst the train wreck of our last two recent early capitulations, in both games he has made brave and effective substitutions (southampton, to steady the ship, to at least retain enough possession to get through the 90, today to inspire a 2nd half that over 90 would have been a terrific performance and result).

    We shouldn’t be surprised by results this season good or bad, it’s not a mystery that we are in a mess and in damage limitation mode, on and off the pitch; sure it was a hard watch but we’re an average team right now, we’re not going to be winning or playing well as often as some fans expect. The best thing we can do is to allow Cifuentes the time and space to set in place the foundations for a new era. Which seems to be his subtly admitted plan.

    For me, the biggest problem at the moment is that this would be much more palatable if we were playing like this with 5 or 6 academy players in the starting XI, but so far, like his predecessors he’s frustratingly sticking with the old heads. That has to change, the time has come to say – let’s stop this mad idea that these old buggers can get us promoted, let’s give the kids ago – they might do just as well, they might do better, who knows – it’s hard to imagine they could do much worse, and if they did, then, unlike what we have now, the bad days will, at least, be a means to an end.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
      jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

      I agree with you despite not really knowing if Cifuentes is any good or not. It would only make things worse to fire him. However we do need to dump players and play to the few strengths we have. Too play this stupid possession passing game we need 11 good players, let’s drop it. Be quicker to get the ball forward and more direct. And Press, Press, Press.

      Like

      1. I don’t think we’ve been quite so rigid in the ‘possession’ philosophy just lately, definitely not in the stoke game, and in the Boro game to a degree too. I think one of Cifuentes’ strengths (certainly compared to our last few managers) is that he is more flexible in his approach. And for what it’s worth, against sheffield I thought we played the possession game very well against a team that (for the last hour) parked the bus – the build up play was excellent, what let us down (again) was the final ball and the quality of finishing.

        I think another factor it’s crucial to not overlook, is that we’ve been denied having a proper #10 most of the season – we have looked a lot better when ramsey has played, and even better when page has played. he’s also had a very unsettled back line and lost his 1st choice keeper. Add into this the fact that Fatawu has been out of form, mavididi went through a goal drought (including missing some sitters. I genuinely don’t think he’s doing a bad job. Can he or anyone else, more importantly, get more out of this squad than he’s already doing?

        Liked by 1 person

  2. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
    jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

    Thanks for the article. Your hard on for Cifuentes to get the sack is still incomprehensible to me. Another manager fired just before a window, another part time manager and another new manager will change NOTHING. It wouldn’t matter who was brought in (even that God Enzo). You make the point about 5 matches, I’d guess we have MANY common points in all matches but Cifuentes certainly isn’t one of them.

    It ISN’T clear the dressing room isn’t listening. It’s clear the players are shit. You are only fooling yourself by thinking that ANY manager can make a good team out of this squad. There are holes everywhere and even the bright spots aren’t nailed on to perform every week. Cifuentes isn’t much good but any manager you foolishly think is taking over this poison chalice isn’t going to be good enough either. How many weeks will you give them?

    First goal showed just how bad our players are – btw you forgot to mention that the ball went straight under Bergovic – that isn’t Cifuentes, that’s player incompetence. Having said that I am happy for Cifuentes to go, just as long as Rudkin and any others linked to our poor transfers and at least 10 players are immediately given the chop too. And that you won’t cry when the young learners who see out the season get relegated. We need radical surgery, not replacing some guy whose just arrived and been given no real backing.

    JJ in a blender – true – but he had a good match and is a good player. You fail to mention that captain and RB Ricardo was nowhere to be seen even though Faes was off the pitch. Skipp did well today but he was a terrible LB beaten almost every time the winger went down the line. He’s shit, and Cifuentes playing him (and Soumaré who played well today) are the real type of sins that I can’t forgive Cifuentes for (along with playing Winks , Vestergaard and playing slow and high – the Enzo factors).

    Good point about our second half play. In the first I was inwardly howling about of lack of pressure all season – another Cifuentes promise that has frustrated me – Where was that press we saw against the europeans at the end of pre-season and then we saw it, and we looked a better team – not good but better.

    I enjoy reading your reports but I also think you naively consider Leicester to be so much better than we are. The fans have been lulled by a 3 to 4 year miracle into actually thinking that our level is better than it is (the players think they are better than they are too). Water finds its level and so do Leicester and we are once again a mid championship team. There is no quick fix and firing the manager now makes no sense whatsoever.

    Like

  3. This narrative that “this is Leicester’s level” is insane and needs calling out. We’ve only finished lower in the table than our current position 6 times since World War 2.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
      jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

      We haven’t finished the season yet. We are a championship level team or a lower top league. Fool yourself as much as you want. The reality is that our position truly reflects the level of our team at the moment. No team has been relegated to the second tier more often than we have.

      Like

  4. Sacking Cifuentes right now, in my opinion, makes absolutely no sense. There’s an old saying: “You can’t polish a t*rd,” and the root causes for our current malaise run much deeper than the manager. The core issues are clear: financial incompetence and, primarily, recruitment incompetence.

    The good news—as many of us know—is that the owners have finally recognized this. They are actively looking for a new Technical Director (basically a Sporting Director), a Commercial Director, and a new CEO to oversee the whole operation.

    Yes, it’s painful to watch the games right now (and trust me, the language I was using after just four minutes of yesterday’s game makes me saying patience seem hilarious!). But we have to try and be sensible. We need to accept that this is a major overhaul, and a quick fix isn’t possible. The key thing is that at least the work is being done.

    The Key Appointment….

    The biggest impact on the pitch will hopefully come from that new Technical Director. Their influence should filter down through the entire scouting network and recruitment strategy. That single appointment (not Martí’s) is absolutely key to our future success, in short LCFC absolutely have to get it right

    Once that person is in place, things might get interesting quickly. If their philosophy doesn’t align with Cifuentes’ approach, or they don’t think he has the potential to bring success, they will likely want to insert their own manager pretty quickly.

    Putting a timeline on it, we can expect new signings based on the new TD’s input to start arriving next summer and winter transfer windows. This means that trully meaningful on-field improvements likely won’t become evident until around the middle of next season.

    This timeline is why I don’t think we will see an immediate change in the manager now, nor any major incomings in the upcoming January transfer window. Of course, offloading certain individuals would be welcome by both the club and the fans if possible!

    Despite all the screaming and shouting (I’m as guilty as anyone!), I actually believe the club is finally doing the right things. Whether we like it or not, the owners have already recognized that this season is about stabilizing the club and laying the foundations for the future. Patience is a tough ask for all of us, but it seems to be the only way forward.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. noisilystrangerfef58960dd Avatar
    noisilystrangerfef58960dd

    I take issue with Skipp having an implausibly good week you have to benchmark that against two teams who had already won the match,he was invisible in midfield at Southampton,he played a great pass to Fatawu against Stoke but he was dreadful and withdrawn against Norwich as he often has been.Soumare was good,second half we know he has the ability to shrug off challenges and go on runs but he can also get basic passes wrong and like Skipp his first tackle is often a foul.The problems with this team is inconsistency in individual players like BDCR came off the bench at Norwich to be the architect of the win,anonymous today and Daka good at Norwich and against Stoke anonymous against Sheffield United.The only consistent player is James,he doesn´t get everything right but he keeps going,ploughs on to get his rewards,we know he actually wants to be here and it shows.I sound like a broken record but too many players who just can´t tackle,Thomas dreadful again but someone has deemed he deserves a new contract.Its largely irrelevant what you do second half when the match is won,its often the case a team wins the second half after losing 3 nil at half time,its job done.The concerning thing for me is not just the defence its that we have had 3 and 2 shots on target in the last two matches and with a defence that is as leaky as ours its giving us little chance of a result,let alone a win

    Like

    1. Not going to defend Thomas’ performances of late but comments like “someone has deemed he deserves a new contract” just goes to emphasise how naive fans can be and how common it is now to talk like they know everything….

      Thomas got his contract because he was probably the one player last season who was putting in decent performances and actually looked like he wanted to be there. his contract was due to expire, so we extended it (which cost us nothing in transfer fees), perhaps even on a reduced rate given the drop to the EFL. He’s a young lad still, with resale value, if we hadn’t extended his contract we’d either have had to buy a new left back or hope that kristiansen stayed healthy.

      So he got a new contract for his performances and because we have no money. Pretty sensible and good business sense actually.

      Like

  6. noisilystrangerfef58960dd Avatar
    noisilystrangerfef58960dd

    The reality is there are options out there for free, far better than Thomas,an example isThierry Small who has a goal and three assists,one against us for Preston was signed on a free transfer from Charlton in the summer,he is quick strong and puts in some great crosses.Yes we may get a fee for Thomas it will never be a lot he is slow and not strong enough.As we have already seen this season there are under 21 players on loan from Premier league clubs having a big impact in the championship, three on loan Spurs players have from memory scored 2 and assisted one but there are probably a lot more.We decided on a loan player with the injury track record of Ricardo and a striker who looked so obviously not what we need,weak and slow

    Like

Leave a comment

viewpoint