We have spent so much of the last 12 years on a rollercoaster ride of highs and lows, that watching a mediocre, mid-table season unfurl in front of us is a strange experience.

Every game feels like a referendum, before turning out to be much less important than we think. Each week you turn towards the league table for answers and find that yes, we’re still just outside the top six.

More than that, each performance from this Leicester City team confirms whatever prior belief you had about them.

At this point, either you think there’s no point sacking yet another manager and that Marti Cifuentes is doing a reasonable job in the circumstances, or you think he has shown little to suggest he is getting the best out of this team and mid-table is an unacceptable return.

How wonderful then that this trip to Ashton Gate provided 45 minutes of ammunition for the first argument, followed by 45 minutes of support for the second.

At the interval, you could plausibly draw a line from Cifuentes’ half time changes against Sheffield United a fortnight ago to Wednesday evening and argue that Leicester City were fixed. The balance sheet in the 180 minutes since that moment showed seven goals scored to only one conceded. Seven goals is an awful lot for this Leicester team, it had taken them eight games to score as many before this flurry.

Along with the raw numbers, there were positive signs in the performances as well. Bristol City looked like an extension of the mini-comeback against Sheffield United and then the win over Derby. The midfield trio, shorn of Harry Winks and Boubakary Soumare’s ponderous play, was more slick and energetic. They were moving the ball quicker, getting it forward and into wide areas with intent.

Moving the ball faster is one of those things that is so obvious it’s hard to understand why teams struggle so much to do it. The knock-on effect of fast interchanges through midfield and more direct passing from the centre backs into the forward line is that the wingers find themselves in one-on-one situations, as opposed to being endlessly double, or even triple, marked.

Suddenly, Stephy Mavididi looks a far more dangerous player. He is basically good enough to be a real threat to any team if you keep allowing him to isolate defenders and drive inside at them. He’s much less effective if he’s held out wide and forced towards the byline. To maximise his strengths he has to get the ball quickly and often, ideally before the defence has had time to reset into a low block.

Leicester did this well in the first half, particularly for the first 20 minutes of the game. Mavididi was creating chances, fashioning opportunities for himself, and got on the end of a back post cross that he headed off the top of the crossbar. He then did Scott Twine all ends up to win the penalty that Jordan Ayew converted.

Along with the midfielders, Ben Nelson and Ayew himself were key parts of the first half display. The contrast between the air of calm that seems to surround Nelson, and the air of ‘inflatable flapping about in a 100mph hurricane’ that follows Faes around is something to behold. The defence looks more composed with him in it, even if it isn’t actually good.

He also offers glimpses of a quality range of passing, some of which went directly into Ayew and which the latter did an excellent job of coming deep to receive the ball to feet. Ayew is good at this very specific thing and not much else; if you could treat him like a table football player and affix a giant pole through his chest about 40 yards out so he didn’t have to worry about ever going forward into the opposition third, he would be brilliant.

Leicester were largely in control of the first half, though that had slipped away a little in the latter stages. The second goal, when it came, kind of happened out of nowhere and had nothing to do with any of the bits of football that had looked good prior to this. Abdul Fatawu got the ball on the half way line, ran all the way to the edge of the box, did two Bristol City players on the byline and squared for Bobby De Cordova Reid to score (again).

This was a good goal, if a woeful defensive effort from Bristol City. It also summed up the strange season Fatawu is having. He did little else all game, even his trademark wild shot from range was nowhere to be seen. Perhaps he’s frustrated or trying too hard to pull off a magic moment every time, but Leicester need him to be much more involved.

So there we are with the good bits. At half time, the Foxes looked pretty comfortable. Bristol City had moments before the break but they hadn’t looked anything special.

Within a minute of the restart this shimmering dreamworld was shattered by the reality of supporting this team. The hosts came out of the blocks like a cannon, Jannik Vestergaard tried to do too much in blocking a cross and diverted it straight to Mark Sykes, who put it past Jakub Stolarczyk.

Bristol City were excellent in the second half. Their intensity kept Leicester pinned back for more or less the entire rest of the game and they created enough chances to win. Stolarczyk was forced into a lot of saves, which he pulled off to varying degrees of competence.

The Robins amassed 14 shots in the second half alone. Many of these were headers, which are not always as good chances as they seem, but on at least a couple of occasions they rose unchallenged only to put the header straight at the goalkeeper. On another, Sinclair Armstrong headed a header that was probably going in anyway up and onto the woodwork, where it bounced out, ricocheted off someone else and somehow slipped wide.

The question from a Leicester perspective is why and how we failed to respond to this in any way. It’s one thing for the opposition to play well, it’s another thing to be completely unable to react to it. Leicester have two fast wingers, before long they had Patson Daka on as well, and yet there was nothing resembling the threat of a counter attack.

There was also little by way of defensive organisation. It’s perfectly reasonable to defend more when you’re ahead, the issue is that there’s no point doing that if you’re going to give up so many shots and concede loads of goals. You may as well keep trying to attack. Even feeding Ayew to fall over and win free kicks would have been a better strategy than camping back in our own box.

To reiterate, Bristol City played well. But this is Bristol City, 10th in the Championship. Not Arsenal or Manchester City. Not even Southampton or Sheffield United, who are either armed with parachute payments or were one of the best Championship teams not to get promoted last term. It’s implausible to argue that Leicester have to accept being outplayed by anyone and everyone. Aw shucks, what can you do. Rudkin out!

Perhaps the most concerning part of the second half was the way in which Cifuentes tried and failed to impact the game. He is constrained by his bench and if you add 50% of your senior midfielders to the bomb squad then you’re going to lack options. At the same time, after one minute of the second half the game had changed significantly, and his reaction was baffling in the extreme.

On a tactical level, the decision to replace Jordan James with Patson Daka and play De Cordova Reid in midfield after 10 minutes of being completely outplayed is one of the stranger substitutions in the annals of Leicester City history. Rarely can a change ever have been so obviously destined to be a disaster. A few minutes later, Cifuentes had to fix the inevitable gaping hole in central midfield by bringing on Bade Aluko and shifting Hamza Choudhury into the middle.

Once Bristol City had equalised, thanks to an absolutely dreadful defensive effort from everybody concerned, he rushed on Louis Page and the inevitable Silko Thomas for Mavididi and Fatawu. It meant that at 2-2, Leicester’s forward line was comprised of Thomas, Page, Ayew, and Daka. Like sending out Mr. Blobby to storm Helm’s Deep.

There is also a more strategic question, which is why his team cannot escape when they’re under pressure. For as much as there is a lack of quality, such as Daka coming on to immediately lose the ball with his first two touches, any team should be able to create the odd counter attack. Even when Andorra come to Wembley they have a couple of attacks.

Leicester, on the other hand, failed to put the pressure back on Bristol City at all. It became like an attack v defence training game for long stretches of time. The home team put an astonishing 35 crosses into the Leicester box. It took until the last minute for Leicester to register their first shot of the half, and that was Ayew blazing over from 35 yards.

Some late lipstick on the pig, thanks to Silko Thomas forcing a save from range at the death, makes the stats look better but doesn’t change the reality of how passive this team was for so long.

The difficulty in making any definite judgement about the manager and how good Leicester are is that there is always a counter argument. The second half here was one of the worst you’re ever likely to see, but the first half was pretty good. Some variation of that applies to the whole season.

If you peek behind the curtain, though, the underlying numbers remain those of a poor bottom half team. Even the good halves are not that good, and they are being overwhelmed by how bad the bad halves are. This was another game in which Leicester were comfortably beaten according to xG.

Cifuentes is just about keeping his head above water thanks to these occasional strong passages of play – the doomed comeback at Sheffield United, a strong start at Derby, then a good first half here. But for us to believe in the long term potential at all then they need to build on them, rather than reverting to type at the first opportunity.

Maybe this is one step forward, two steps back approach is how things are going to be, at least until the points deduction is confirmed. Leicester are treading water until further notice and that is good enough to hold off any argument that we deserve anything better.

We’re fine, middle-of-the-road. You win some, you lose some, you draw a lot. If you need us, we’ll be a couple of points off the playoffs.

11 responses to “Bristol City 2 Leicester City 2: The one half wonders”

  1. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
    jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

    Thanks James, Another good article.

    We may sit on different sides of the divide but we still mostly agree.

    However I am surprised that you found the substitution of JJ puzzling. He is our most important player but like so many he is incapable of playing 2 matches in a week. He was mostly inexistant in the first half and clearly could not keep up with the play. He had to be replaced. The problem is we only have kids (or a lazy arsehole or two) to replace him. What can we expect of a 17 year old or a near debutant in these circumstances?

    Sadly JJ wasn’t the only very tired looking player BEFORE HT. It says a lot about our stamina when Ayew is playing the whole match despite being 75 and having to run around pressing the defence. Bobby Reid and Skipp also looked half dead, Mavadidi and Fatawu died during the second half and our RB/LB have to run too much anyway.

    The second half was depressing but predictable. We do not have the players to excel in the slog of a championship season. We have old men and kids and a clear failure to train stamina. Thankfully we still have some talent and this is holding us in the position we deserve – outside the playoffs but well above relegation. January will be the true test of our leaders. We NEED a true goal scoring striker and we need to get rid and replace the arseholes. If we do, we can still make the playoffs. If we don’t then 14th is a fair position for us.

    I won’t be condemning Cifuentes until he has a team that is good enough to compete.

    Like

    1. That’s fair enough about JJ but I think it reflects Marti’s weird decision making, why not take JJ off after an hour at the weekend when we were 3-0 up knowing you have another game in a couple of days? Rather than be in this situation where it’s 2-1 and the team is in trouble and you’re suddenly forced to play a crazy midfield.

      It’s also strange if he genuinely can’t play two games a week. Ricardo at least has the excuse of endless injuries, JJ is 21 years old. It’s completely normal to play midweek games, everyone has to do it.

      And that applies to the fitness thing as well. Why are we so unfit? It’s not like everyone is 40 years old – 8 of the starting XI are in their 20s. Page is super young, everyone else is just a normal footballer age. Did we just not do any fitness work this summer?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. the Ricardo situation is very odd. If he’s not going to come on it the situation presented last night, why even have him on the bench? I’d go further and wonder why we’re still paying him his full salary? If the rest of us went part time, we’d be on half pay. Inevitably, we’ll offer him a 2/3 extension in the summer and compound the issue.

        Page and Thomas did well and helped ’tilt the pitch back our way. We were dying on our arse before that and staring defeat in the face. They gave us much needed energy and in Page’s case, composure too.

        The truth is, until we have a proper striker and indeed two new full backs, we’ll be stuck where we are.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
        jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

        I agree with you 100% here. It is ridiculous that we’re paying Ricardo a full time wage when he is incapable of playing full time, the truth is he should’ve been sold in the summer or had his contract re-negotiated to fit his new circumstances. Fans talk about him being a class player but the truth is he’s only half a player and championship level. I love him but his inability to play when needed is hurting us. I guess he’s on the bench because he’s the Captain and because we have no-one else, so it’s a break glass in Emergency measure. Honestly I think Hamza is a far better dynamic DCM than RB (better than Skipp) and shouldn’t be on at RB. Play Aluko and let’s move on.

        A True scoring striker is what we need before we can think of challenging in the championship. If we don’t get one Jan 1st then the leadership have signalled that this is a waiting year without any endeavour or ambition.

        Like

      3. jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334 Avatar
        jovialunabashedly72a7bc2334

        I agree that Marti’s decisions are suspect. I think he kept JJ on because we NEEDED the win against Derby so badly and no JJ weakens our team incredibly. He in essence sacrificed the second half of Bristol for the win against Derby. Possibly the correct decision and nearly a masterstroke. As you say the real question is why can’t our players manage 2 games a week. The whole midfield (and most of the team) looked very tired before the end of the first half. Our stamina is a tragedy, especially when the only way for us to win games is to maintain a strong press. Once that goes we are a poor team.

        Cifuentes has to take some criticism here. Jock Wallace would’ve had them running up and down the quarry works or seaside dunes after seeing this squad. Pre-season is supposed to be the time to work on stamina, that was Andy King’s reign, did he? Didn’t he? but whether he did or didn’t it should be clear to Cifuentes that his whole plan requires players who can run forever.

        The alternative would’ve been to start the kids, they can surely run, but are they experienced enough, yet, to win?

        Like

  2. uniquescrumptiouslya3ffa61ba1 Avatar
    uniquescrumptiouslya3ffa61ba1

    Absolutely spot

    Like

  3. Marti has the biggest club and the highest paid players 13th in the championship!

    Like

  4. This argument about James is moot, as he was carrying an injury (groin).

    It is clear Cifuentes got it all wrong when he made the change, the option would have been to push Hamza forward and perhaps bring on Aluko and Faes to make a back five.

    We didn’t try to match up with them, or be proactive about an approach to dealing with a team under the pump.

    I can understand using Daka as an outlet, but he is not the most intelligent player and does have a habit of losing the ball. I have reservation regarding the fitness situation and I think King would have replicated what we had done the season before, as the task to train the players came at short notice. I would suspect given the task next season he would have applied Pearson’s approach, where players are given a schedule of fitness and not to come back unable to meet the requirements.

    Like

    1. Correct. And in response to your criticism of his replacements, i can actually understand the logic behind it. In short – attack is the best form of defence. By bringing on faes and aluko and pushing the defensive hamza into the midfield he would basically be admitting that we were just going to try to cling on to the lead for the last half hour.

      His mantra is to keep pushing for more goals. And bringing on Daka against a side playing right up the pitch is absolutely the smartest solution. Sadly, it also relies on the defence not switching off and the squad as a whole not suddenly capitulating and failing to register a pass completion rate of more than 50%.

      The tactics and decision making were sound – the problem was that the players, for whatever reason, spectacularly failed to execute.

      Like

  5. Players have been so accustomed to playing tippy happy crap that as soon as they move up a gear they’re all knackered. It’s pathetic.

    Like

  6. We have only 2 or 3 decent players, and the rest are a shambles compared to 4 years ago when we had tielemans maddison, barnes vardy, scmeichel etc

    But we cannot even maximise what little talent we have. Fatawu and Mavididi should terrorise championship defences but neither can supply accurate crosses/centres.

    We should employ that magnificent crosser Mark Albrighton to teach the lads the physical and mental attributes of wing play.

    Monga, Silko and Marcal could benefit as well.

    Come on, City, wake up!!

    Like

Leave a comment

viewpoint