Two days after a shocking set of accounts put the club’s future into stark reality, Jamie Barnard is still just as furious with those who’ve overseen the chaos – and ponders a legacy in serious question.


“Accountability keeps standards high.”

It’s February 2017, and I find myself trotting this line out repeatedly as I try to explain to fans of other clubs on Twitter why the sacking of Claudio Ranieri is the right call. This bizarre notion, peddled by some of the biggest pundits in the country, that Ranieri had earned the right to take us to a level lower than that at which he’d picked us up in, seemed to be getting traction.

Fast forward seven years, and where has the accountability gone at Leicester City Football Club?

As a financial bombshell has blown off the fragile mask that fooled the majority of the country into believing Leicester were a ‘well-run club’, it’s high time we saw some accountability return.

Because there was certainly none as Brendan Rodgers seemed to be doing his best to talk his way out of a job, undermining his players, the club, the fans, or essentially anyone or anything that would fast track him to a P45. As he gave week after week of disgraceful press conferences or post-match interviews, you had to wonder if anyone in the club was taking him to task on the effect his words were having.

There certainly wasn’t any in the summer when a relegation that many fans had been warning was coming for months was finally realised. What we got instead was news of an internal review that apparently found all was hunky dory and there was no need for change at senior management or board level. And a statement from owner Top which, TLDR, could be condensed down to: “Stop being mean to me, we won the Premier League once”.

There was no accountability when our player trading was a disgrace. When it was fine to send a fax 14 seconds late and leave a multi-million pound asset sat in the stands for months while being perfectly fit to play, or when numerous international players walked away for zilch having been allowed to run their contracts down. Director of Football, Jon Rudkin, has been appearing to direct little more than an absolute circus.

There was no accountability when the club was fined £880,000 by the Competition & Markets Authority for ripping fans off over shirt sales. Or when they refused to engage with the Foxes Trust as they sought assurances over the management of the club in the summer. Or when the lack of general sale of match tickets – leaving empty seats in the stadium and locking out future generations of fans – was reversed but then quietly rolled back again in favour of peddling costly memberships.

Lonely at the Top

And now, as the chickens come home to roost, there seems to be little communication from the club as we choose to wage war on both the Premier League and EFL simultaneously. We’ve squirmed our way through loopholes and interpretations of legislation to play the victim and protest our innocence, all whilst knowing a monumentally damning financial result was about to drop.

Fire up the “stop being mean to me” template, top and tail it with some thinly veiled legal threats, and crack on.

The fish rots from the head down. And we’ve had a head loss. Top, barely at the King Power Stadium when he hasn’t got an on-pitch marriage proposal to make. Communicating only through programme notes likely penned by the Communications Director and given a cursory glance for sign-off. Perfecting the look of disdain as Union FS unfurled a, ‘Board, the time to act is now’ banner whilst we still had time aplenty to avoid the most avoidable relegation the Premier League has ever seen.

I’m seeing another little line crop up in recent weeks and months that, if we’re being honest, is pure conjecture: this would never have happened under Vichai. I’m going to go there, fellow Leicester City fans – I think it’s nonsense.

There were plenty of mistakes and shortcomings under Vichai too. Let’s not forget that one of the first things we had to do on arrival back to the Premier League in 2014 was pay a fine to the EFL for our financial misdemeanours. Debts racked up chasing ‘names’ and splurging on bang average players.

But what Vichai did do well was PR. It always irked me, the line that Leicester fans and the chairman had a great relationship. Yes, we never would have achieved what we did without him buying the club and he made wise contributions to our local community but, truth bomb: 95% of Leicester fans wouldn’t recognise his voice and an even higher percentage couldn’t pronounce his surname.

Back in the good old days, financial carelessness was simply mopped up by converting debt into equity. But get forced into an environment where the rules don’t allow you to just do that anymore, and the game changes. Top inherited the burden of a legacy he could never sustain because it was built on a freak sporting performance, and tighter regulations on how an owner could operate.

Own it

What will the King Power legacy be now?

A period of silverware, European tours and some of the best footballing sides ever to have donned the Leicester City shirt. But it’s all been followed – accompanied, even – by financial mismanagement that has resulted in a surge of Foxes Trust memberships for the first time since 2002, and penalties from the footballing authorities likely to set us back years, if not a decade. Kind of taints it a little, don’t you think?

I’ve noticed in the financial reports over the past few years that we pay a substantial ‘management fee’ to King Power. Well, does anyone have the receipt for that? Because I think we might just be due a refund.

Standards slipped. And they continue to do so further with every deception and evasion the club try to pull in the middle of this sorry mess. Accountability keeps standards high, and our lack of it throughout the club has dragged us into the gutter.

Over to you, Top. Any chance of it now? Unless Rudkin and Whelan are packing their bags by the time we’re on the road to Plymouth, and unless he starts the process of a phased sale of the club, then it’ll be like Alex Smithies: you’re regularly told it’s there, but you’ve never seen any sign of it.

Yes we lived the dream, but we might be just about to start the nightmare. In the words of Andrea Bocelli, time to say goodbye.

Join the Foxes Trust for £10: https://foxestrust.co.uk/membership


document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo’).onclick=function(){ window.open(‘https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/Premier+League/Leicester+City’,’newsnow’); }; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo’).style.cursor=’pointer’; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo_a’).style.textDecoration=’none’; document.getElementById(‘newsnowlogo_a’).style.borderBottom=’0 none’;

10 responses to “Tainted love: What will the King Power legacy be now?”

  1. That might be the dumbest thing I have ever read on this sight. Top, don’t listen to this titanic tantrum from a fan who clearly does not really like success on the pitch.

    Like

    1. No David Allen, that’s the dumbest thing I have read.Are you an Ostrich.

      Like

      1. No David is correct, So you would like Top to sell the club and who do we get then owners like previously who took us into receivership or owners who want to make a profit for themselves and are happy to sit in the bottom half of the table and sell players as soon as they become valuable eg when we had Heskey.If you want to support a club who are winning trophies go and support one of the so called top 6 teams who can get away with financial irregularities and also in whose favour the money is split. Last season the so called top 6 teams earned between more than £100 to £200 million more from tv rights than the city.

        Like

  2. A brilliantly written article and one I whole heartily agree with. Quite rightly, the start of this goes back to our previous EFL fine when a Company was reportedly set up on an industrial estate to sell marketing rights for LCFC. It had no telephone, no staff, but enabled KP to get round an alleged technicality in the EFL financial rules at that time.

    Also, annoying to me was the stealth increase on ticket prices which added £1.50 for a booking fee. At the same time KP proudly announced another year where no ticket prices increases would take place.

    In relation to the shirt price fixing scandal, the fact that it was reported that the Directors didn’t know about it is beyond belief, if true or, equally appaling, if not true.

    The arrogance of the Directors to state that their Financial Plan was based on a much higher PL finish and a place In Europe is incredulous. What you aim for, and what you plan for, have to be based on a sound Financial basis that doesn’t put the Club’s future at risk.

    Finally, the need for Seagrave has been questioned previously. GIven we have it, I question if we need Belvoir Drive. Surely the women’s team can be accommodated at Seagrave.

    I cannot forget the highs of 15/16 and CL in 16/17 but I an reminded of a Bob Dylan lyric, ‘There’ s no success like failure, and failure’s no success at all’

    Col Murrant

    Like

  3. Hmmm. So what do we actually want for our club? An owner that invests less money to keep within PSR? A board that budgets for relegation every season, to be on the safe side?The most successful 10 years – by a mile- in our history hasn’t overlapped with our owner’s stewardship by accident. Yes, the last 12 months have been difficult, but being ambitious comes with risk of failure, particularly in sport. Building the infrastructure of Seagrave and the KP expansion plans are foundations to position our club for long-term success and short-term disappointments shouldn’t blind us to the hugely positive impact our owners have had and will continue to have for our club. We’re lucky to have them.

    Like

  4. I find myself cheering pieces like this for their hardhitting criicsm but equally value the ownership of KP.I remember in the immediate wake of the Peter Taylor debacle asking a director why the board did not act quicker to recognise Taylor’s incompetence. His reply was that if you hire experts you have to stand by them .I think all this present trouble is rooted in the current owners relying too trustingly in their executives in the UK. Like almost all owners they are based overseas and football is not their primary business so they rely on ‘experts’ here.Top is not an expert on professional football. But neither are Rudkin and Whelan, neither, arguably, are they in finance. Yes, there have been memorable times under their stewardship but they have got away with some pretty reckless mortgaging of the future except they haven’t and now the reckoning has arrived.The silverware cannot be removed but the club’s reputation can.

    Like

  5. Vichai learned quickly what was needed to keep this club on the right level. Whelan and Rudkin are left and right of Khun Top. For Khun Top to begin his own destiny, he has to offload Rudkin. He has little to no qualification for his current post and is the reason why we are where we are today, due to the contracts he has agreed.

    Like

  6. It’s pretty dumb to use ‘sight’ as well, David…

    Like

  7. Looking forward to the game tomorrow. At the end of the last game we went to using Wing Backs and both wingers off. This may have been to rest players but importantly a noticeable shift to a Plan B. We looked just as strong and imposing with this tactic and if Maresca applies these traits, we have a better use of our squad. If we start with a back 5 then I will be convinced that we can collect the points we need to get us over the line. If Maresca holds to the setup that we have used all season, we are likely to fail, teams do not fall into our traps, they bring on fresh players, so they are not tired but we are, and they have the advantage. Norwich chose not to change their system and came unstuck. Other teams will not make the same mistake!!

    Like

  8. "Finally, the need for Seagrave has been questioned previously. GIven we have it, I question if we need Belvoir Drive. Surely the women’s team can be accommodated at Seagrave." – Col Murrant.

    I am not sure you want to suggest the ladies team train at Seagrave?? With the ladies ex-manager having recently been fired for having an inappropriate relationship with a player, it would be another example of mismanagement should we allow that situation to develop. Familiarity, seeing someone three times a week and having banter has the potential to turn into something that neither party are looking for, just that their work has put them in a situation where a relationship could happen. They may be consenting adults, but the distraction that it brings, the anxiety of the wife knowing that other women are a part of your husband, boyfriends daily life, would lead to a household full of suspicion and mistrust. So far too many shortsighted decision have been enacted at this club, we just need to but a stop to compounding the errors that have already been made.

    Like

Leave a reply to Loz Farmer Cancel reply

viewpoint